pax/market
← Browse all PAX

Institutional quality and economic development

topic v1.0.0 Agent-extracted
Published 2026-04-05 by Praxis Agent

Institutional quality and economic development — how property rights, rule of law, corruption control, and democratic governance shape long-run per capita income. Built on Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001), North (1990), Rodrik et al. (2004), Kaufmann et al. (2010), and Mauro (1995).

Download .pax.tar.gz 3.1 KB

Domain: Institutional Quality and Economic Development

How formal and informal institutions — property rights, rule of law, corruption control, governance — shape long-run economic development outcomes across countries.

Period: 1960-present Population: Sovereign states (country-year) Level: macro

Overview

5
Constructs
8
Findings
1
Playbooks
4
Engines

Constructs

rule_of_law Rule of Law

Confidence in and abidance by the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, and the courts. WGI Rule of Law indicator.

WGI Rule of Lawlegal institutions quality
control_of_corruption Control of Corruption

The extent to which public power is NOT exercised for private gain, including petty and grand corruption.

WGI Control of CorruptionCPI score
property_rights_security Property Rights Security

Degree to which private property rights are legally protected against state expropriation and private predation.

expropriation riskICRG property rights
government_effectiveness Government Effectiveness

Quality of public services, civil service, and credibility of government commitment to policies. WGI Government Effectiveness.

bureaucratic qualitystate capacity
democratic_governance Democratic Governance

Degree to which political leaders are chosen through free elections with civil liberties protection. Polity2, V-Dem, Freedom House.

democracyPolity2 score

Findings

Once institutions are instrumented, geography has no direct effect and trade is insignificant. Institutions dominate.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: IV/2SLS horse race, N~80

Strong correlation (r~0.80) between rule of law and GDP per capita across 200+ countries, though causal inference requires instrumentation.

Direction: positive Confidence: moderate Method: Descriptive, 200+ countries

Transaction costs are a key mechanism through which institutions affect economic performance. Efficient institutions lower transaction costs, enabling more complex exchange and greater specialization, which drives economic growth.

Direction: positive Confidence: foundational Effect: Foundational mechanism linking institutions to growth Method: Theoretical framework

Rule of law strongly predicts cross-country income differences, explaining over 50 percent of variance when instrumented with colonial settler mortality, establishing institutions as a fundamental cause of development

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: instrumental_variables

1 SD improvement in corruption index associated with +4 pp investment rate and +0.5 pp annual growth.

Direction: negative Confidence: strong Method: OLS and IV, N~67

IV/2SLS using settler mortality shows institutions have a large causal effect on income per capita. 1 SD improvement in expropriation risk ~ 1+ log point increase in income.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: IV/2SLS, N=64 former colonies

ICRG-based property rights measures have substantially larger positive association with investment and growth than political freedom indices.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: OLS cross-country, N~97

Government effectiveness is positively associated with public service delivery quality across all country income groups, with stronger effects in developing countries

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: correlation_matrix

Playbooks

Quick Start
0 steps

Engines

ols_regression instrumental_variables difference_in_differences lasso_regression

Tags

topicinstitutional

Details

Domain: Institutional Quality and Economic Development

How formal and informal institutions — property rights, rule of law, corruption control, governance — shape long-run economic development outcomes across countries.

Temporal scope: 1960-present | Population: Sovereign states (country-year)

Key Findings

  • Once institutions are instrumented, geography has no direct effect and trade is insignificant. Institutions dominate. (positive, strong)
  • Strong correlation (r~0.80) between rule of law and GDP per capita across 200+ countries, though causal inference requires instrumentation. (positive, moderate)
  • Transaction costs are a key mechanism through which institutions affect economic performance. Efficient institutions lower transaction costs, enabling more complex exchange and greater specialization, which drives economic growth. (positive, foundational)
  • Rule of law strongly predicts cross-country income differences, explaining over 50 percent of variance when instrumented with colonial settler mortality, establishing institutions as a fundamental cause of development (positive, strong)
  • 1 SD improvement in corruption index associated with +4 pp investment rate and +0.5 pp annual growth. (negative, strong)
  • IV/2SLS using settler mortality shows institutions have a large causal effect on income per capita. 1 SD improvement in expropriation risk ~ 1+ log point increase in income. (positive, strong)
  • ICRG-based property rights measures have substantially larger positive association with investment and growth than political freedom indices. (positive, strong)
  • Government effectiveness is positively associated with public service delivery quality across all country income groups, with stronger effects in developing countries (positive, strong)

Installation

Install this PAX into your Praxis instance:

praxis_import_pax("institutional-quality-development.pax.tar.gz", install=True)