pax/market
← Browse all PAX

Bartel Comp Materials

field v1.0.5
Bartel Computational Materials Science · 2016-2026 · Crystal structure and composition level · Inorganic crystalline materials, crystal compositions, synthesis reactions, and electrode materials

Comprehensive knowledge pack covering Christopher Bartel's body of work in computational materials science — machine learning for materials discovery, autonomous synthesis laboratories, perovskite stability prediction, battery cathode design, solid-state synthesis thermodynamics, catalysis and energy conversion, and crystal topology characterization. Integrates 142 publications (2016-2026), 6 open-source code repositories from Bartel-Group GitHub, and cross-domain construct linkages spanning tolerance factors, neural network potentials, thermodynamic selectivity, and generative crystal models.

Download .pax.tar.gz 19.0 KB
71
Constructs
22
Findings
5
Playbooks
4
Engines

Playbooks

Cross-Domain Literature Survey
2 minutes 3 steps

Literature synthesis across all 7 Bartel research domains. Uses unsupervised clustering to identify natural construct groupings, then probes cross-domain relationships via correlation and regression.

correlation_matrixols_regressionkmeans_clustering
Perovskite Formability Screening
2 minutes 4 steps

Screen ABX3 compositions for perovskite formability using the revised tolerance factor (tau), geometric descriptors, and ML classifiers. Combines closed-form calculation with statistical validation.

correlation_matrixlogistic_regressiontolerance_factor_calculatorrandom_forest
Quick Start — Bartel Comp Materials
1–3 minutes 1 steps

Basic analysis workflow for the bartel_comp_materials domain.

logistic_regression
Stability Prediction Benchmark
3 minutes 4 steps

Compare ML approaches for predicting thermodynamic stability (formation energy, energy above hull). Benchmarks linear models against gradient boosting and CHGNet neural network potentials.

correlation_matrixgradient_boostingridge_regressionpydmclab_ml_potential_relaxation
Synthesis Feasibility Assessment
2 minutes 4 steps

Evaluate synthesis feasibility for target materials by combining thermodynamic selectivity analysis with ML classifiers trained on reaction outcomes. References Bartel's synthesis assessment tools.

synth_assess_selectivitycorrelation_matrixlogistic_regressionrandom_forest

Constructs

band_gap Band Gap

The energy difference between the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum in a crystalline material, measured in eV via DFT (PBE functional). Determines whether a material is metallic (0 eV), semiconducting, or insulating. A key target in Matbench regression tasks.

bulk_modulus Bulk Modulus (VRH)

Voigt-Reuss-Hill averaged bulk modulus in GPa, measuring resistance to uniform compression. Computed from DFT elastic tensors. One of the Matbench benchmark regression targets (log_gvrh task).

crystal_structure_representation Crystal Structure Representation

The mathematical encoding of a crystalline material for ML input. Ranges from composition-only vectors (element fractions) to graph-based representations (atoms as nodes, bonds as edges with distances/angles). Graph representations enable equivariant GNNs; compositional features enable tabular ML (CGCNN, MEGNet, MACE vs. Magpie, SOAP).

gnn_interatomic_potential Graph Neural Network Interatomic Potential (GNN-IP)

A machine-learned force field that maps crystal graph inputs to total energies, atomic forces, and stresses using message-passing neural networks. Trained on DFT trajectories (e.g., MPtrj ~1.6M structures), enabling geometry optimization at DFT accuracy but orders of magnitude faster. Examples: M3GNet, CHGNet, MACE-MP, SevenNet.

formation_energy_per_atom Formation Energy per Atom

The energy released or required to form a crystal from its constituent elements in their standard reference states, normalized by the number of atoms. Measured in eV/atom via DFT calculations. The primary regression target in materials property prediction benchmarks.

thermodynamic_stability Thermodynamic Stability

Binary classification of whether a crystal is thermodynamically stable (on the convex hull) or not. In Matbench Discovery, 15.3% of WBM test structures are stable. The primary classification target for discovery benchmarks.

revised_tolerance_factor Revised Tolerance Factor (τ)

A geometric tolerance factor τ proposed by Bartel et al. (2019) that predicts whether a given ABX3 composition will form a stable perovskite structure. Unlike the classical Goldschmidt tolerance factor t, τ incorporates the oxidation state of A-site cation and uses a different functional form: τ = r_X/r_B - n_A(n_A - r_A/r_B / ln(r_A/r_B)). Achieves 92% accuracy on experimental perovskite/non-perovskite classification.

energy_above_hull Energy Above Convex Hull

The energy difference (eV/atom) between a material and the convex hull of thermodynamically stable phases at the same composition. E_hull = 0 means the material is on the hull (thermodynamically stable). Positive values indicate metastability. The primary metric for assessing whether a computationally predicted material could exist.

neural_network_potential Neural Network Interatomic Potential

A machine learning model trained on DFT data that predicts atomic energies, forces, and stresses from atomic positions and species. Examples include CHGNet, M3GNet, MACE, and SchNet. Enables molecular dynamics and structure relaxation at near-DFT accuracy but orders of magnitude faster. CHGNet uniquely incorporates magnetic moments and charge states.

synthesis_success_rate Synthesis Success Rate

The fraction of computationally predicted target materials that are successfully synthesized in the laboratory. In the A-Lab autonomous synthesis platform, measured as the number of targets where XRD confirms the desired phase divided by the total number of attempted syntheses. Key metric for evaluating the practical utility of computational materials discovery.

thermodynamic_selectivity Thermodynamic Selectivity

The ratio of thermodynamic driving force for the target synthesis product versus competing byproducts. Higher selectivity means the desired phase is strongly favored over alternative reaction products. Quantified as the free energy difference between the target reaction and the most favorable competing reaction pathway.

perovskite_formability Perovskite Formability

Binary classification of whether an ABX3 composition forms a perovskite crystal structure (1) or not (0). Determined experimentally via XRD phase identification. The primary prediction target for tolerance factor models and ML classifiers in the perovskite design literature.

Findings

CHGNet, trained on 1.5M MPtrj DFT trajectory frames with magnetic moment supervision, achieves force MAE of ~0.06 eV/Å and correctly predicts DFT-relaxed structure energies within ~0.03 eV/atom for the majority of Materials Project entries.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: held-out test set evaluation on Materials Project data; phonon benchmark

CHGNet trained on 1.5M MPtrj DFT trajectory frames achieves force MAE of ~0.06 eV/Å and energy MAE of ~0.03 eV/atom on Materials Project held-out entries.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: held-out test evaluation on Materials Project data

The revised tolerance factor τ achieves 92% classification accuracy for perovskite vs non-perovskite ABX3 compositions across 576 experimental data points, significantly outperforming the classical Goldschmidt tolerance factor t (74% accuracy).

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Effect: AUC improvement from 0.74 to 0.92 Method: logistic_regression

The revised tolerance factor τ correctly predicts the stability of both oxide and halide perovskites within a single model, whereas previous tolerance factors required separate parameterizations for different anion chemistries.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Method: logistic_regression

The A-Lab autonomous synthesis platform successfully synthesized 41 of 58 target materials (71% success rate) within 17 days of continuous operation, with each synthesis attempt taking approximately 4 hours from precursor mixing to XRD characterization.

Direction: positive Confidence: strong Effect: 71% success rate (41/58 targets) Method: experimental_validation

Engines

logistic_regressionrandom_forestgradient_boostingridge_regression
Pack metadata

Sources

Bartel, C.J. (2021). Toward autonomous design and synthesis of novel inorganic materials DOI
Deng, B., Zhong, P., Jun, K., Riebesell, J., Han, K., Bartel, C.J., Ceder, G. (2023). CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling DOI
Bartel, C.J.; Sutton, C.; Goldsmith, B.R.; Ouyang, R.; Musgrave, C.B.; Ghiringhelli, L.M.; Scheffler, M. (2019). New tolerance factor to predict the stability of perovskite oxides and halides DOI
Szymanski, N.J.; Rendy, B.; Fei, Y.; Kumar, R.E.; He, T.; Milber, D.; Jiang, H.; Bartel, C.J.; et al. (2023). An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials DOI

Tags

field

Details

Domain: Bartel Computational Materials Science

Computational materials science research spanning machine learning for property prediction, autonomous synthesis, perovskite stability, battery materials, solid-state synthesis thermodynamics, catalysis, and crystal topology. Covers the complete body of work of the Design of Materials on Computers (DMC) Lab at the University of Minnesota.

Temporal scope: 2016-2026 | Population: Inorganic crystalline materials, crystal compositions, synthesis reactions, and electrode materials

Key Findings

  • CHGNet, trained on 1.5M MPtrj DFT trajectory frames with magnetic moment supervision, achieves force MAE of ~0.06 eV/Å and correctly predicts DFT-relaxed structure energies within ~0.03 eV/atom for the majority of Materials Project entries. (positive, strong)
  • CHGNet trained on 1.5M MPtrj DFT trajectory frames achieves force MAE of ~0.06 eV/Å and energy MAE of ~0.03 eV/atom on Materials Project held-out entries. (positive, strong)
  • The revised tolerance factor τ achieves 92% classification accuracy for perovskite vs non-perovskite ABX3 compositions across 576 experimental data points, significantly outperforming the classical Goldschmidt tolerance factor t (74% accuracy). (positive, strong)
  • The revised tolerance factor τ correctly predicts the stability of both oxide and halide perovskites within a single model, whereas previous tolerance factors required separate parameterizations for different anion chemistries. (positive, strong)
  • The A-Lab autonomous synthesis platform successfully synthesized 41 of 58 target materials (71% success rate) within 17 days of continuous operation, with each synthesis attempt taking approximately 4 hours from precursor mixing to XRD characterization. (positive, strong)
  • ML-guided precursor selection combined with Bayesian optimization of synthesis parameters enabled the A-Lab to autonomously discover synthesis recipes for materials that had never been experimentally reported before. (positive, strong)
  • CHGNet achieves force prediction MAE of 30 meV/Å and energy MAE of 22 meV/atom on the Materials Project trajectory (MPtrj) dataset containing 1.58M structures, while uniquely modeling charge states and magnetic moments through explicit charge equilibration. (positive, strong)
  • CHGNet correctly predicts the magnetic ground states of Fe, Co, Ni, and Mn-containing materials and the charge-transfer-driven phase transitions in LixMnO2 battery cathodes, capabilities absent in charge-agnostic potentials like M3GNet. (positive, strong)

…and 14 more findings

Installation

Install this PAX into your Praxis instance — or set up Praxis first if you haven't yet.

praxis_import_pax("bartel-comp-materials.pax.tar.gz", install=True)